mellaw6565
WSRats- based on the people I know who were involved at the time – it was both a democratic smear campaign and lying on Thomas’ part. They had an affair, she wanted more and was spurned, and then she told someone about it who passed on the info to democrats who recruited her testimony for the confirmation hearings. As with all the other “political” affairs we’ve seen, there’s a kernel of truth and lots of mistruths on all sides.
I, for one, didn’t care about his personal affairs but judged him on his legal scholarship and constitutional prowess – I just didn’t see it and never wanted to see him confirmed. IMO, he won’t be remembered for any lasting legal theories or decisions.
Ken – while I’m not a Thomas supporter, I’m offended by your “Uncle Clarence” remark – which I believe is racist as it refers to “Uncle Tom”. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from those types of remarks or characterizations.